Meaning
Valuation principle allows importers to base the dutiable value on the price paid in an earlier sale between a manufacturer and a middleman rather than the final sale to the importer. This rule is a powerful tool for reducing duty costs because the price in the first sale is always lower than the price in the second sale. To use this method, the importer must prove that the first sale was clearly intended for export to the country of importation.
First sale for export is a complex procedure that requires the cooperation of the manufacturer and the middleman to provide the necessary documentation. This principle is accepted in several major trade jurisdictions but is subject to strict verification requirements.
Eligibilty Condition
The behavior of this principle depends on the importer’s ability to satisfy three specific criteria. First, there must be a multi tiered transaction involving at least three parties, typically a manufacturer and a middleman and the final importer. Second, the goods must have been destined for the country of import at the time of the first sale, which is proven through shipping marks and labels and production orders.
Third, both sales must be at arm’s length, meaning the prices were not influenced by any relationship between the parties. If any of these conditions are not met, the customs authority will reject the lower value and apply the duty to the final sale price. The importer must maintain a complete trail of documents for both transactions to sustain the claim.
Verification Trail
Proof for these declarations is found in the commercial invoices and the purchase orders and the payment records for both legs of the deal. The manufacturer must provide an invoice to the middleman, and the middleman must provide an invoice to the importer. Both of these documents must be submitted to the customs authorities or kept on file for audit.
The records must also include proof of the movement of the goods, such as the bill of lading and the inland freight invoices. Auditors will often check if the manufacturer was aware that the goods were being produced for the specific export market. This verification can be difficult because the middleman may be reluctant to share their purchase price and profit margins with the importer.
Duty Saving
Financial benefits of this method are found in the direct reduction of the landed cost for the imported products. By paying duty on a lower value, the importer can save significant amounts of money over a large volume of trade. This saving can make the difference between a profitable and an unprofitable product line.
However, the costs of maintaining the program are high, as it requires constant monitoring and a high level of cooperation from suppliers. If the program is managed poorly and customs rejects the first sale value, the importer will be liable for the difference in duty and interest and penalties. The risk of an audit is much higher when using this method, so a thorough compliance program is a mandatory requirement.